5.
The presentation of the “text”
The overall structure must be clearly presented: for example, chapter headings & sub-chapter headings & subheadings should be different, the logical layout of chapters and paragraphs should be reasonable, and the graphic tables displayed should be intuitive and beautiful.
Language: academic writing style, that is, pay attention to tenses and use objective and neutral personal perspective and language, do not have strong individualistic feelings and describe from a subjective perspective.
Technical terms & theorems & formulas, etc., need to be explained in notes in order to make it easy for people who are not familiar with the field to understand.
Ring material:
Statistical tables and figures can be applied.
A chart.
Photos, maps, etc., are used to support the work in a figurative sense, but note that it must be mentioned in the text and marked correctly.
The names, numbers and titles of all materials must be directly above or below, usually prefixed with “Figure” or “Table” in uppercase letters.
You can choose to copy the or drawing, but the graphics should be clearly visible.
In theory, the chart should not exceed an A4-sized page.
All rows and columns have clear headings.
The chart should have only grid lines (usually up to 4-5 lines) needed to understand trends and relationships, and legends and descriptive comments are usually far away from the grid lines and need to be clearly visible.
Reference citation: need to play a unified style, suggest Harvard format.
Appendix: may contain a list of survey respondents, a list of documents collected, data sources, data sheets, and letters.
Excerpts from questionnaires, notices or statutory regulations, as well as summaries of previous studies, etc.
Convention for submission format.
Title page: school logo& title & year of submission & College where the student ID& is located & submit statement).
Abstract: usually in 300 words, briefly introduce the topics, methods and results of the study.
Thank you.
Table of contents: list the title and subtitle of the paper, and the page number is represented by Arabic numerals.
Illustration form: all tables, maps, plans, charts.
The photo should provide a serial number.
Title and page number original statement: join according to the requirements of the school.
Text: the format should be 1.5 or 2 times spaced, and the font should be 12 (times).
Indented citations with more than three lines.
Single spacing should be used for footnotes and references.
Chapter headings should be bold and capitalized; section headings should be bold.
Last post– the scoring dimension of the school.
1.
Content.
Relevance to policies and practices in areas related to the research programme.
A) is the paper relevant to the disciplines of programmes and policies / practices in that particular field?
Does the author show any interest in work and policy / practice.
Appreciation of relevance, or a deeper academic understanding of the discipline?
B) whether the relevant theoretical and methodological issues are adequately addressed and, where appropriate, emphasized within the scope of the defined topic.
Policy / practice impact of work?
Does it avoid superfluous details?
The goal, purpose and intention of the study.
A) does the author clearly clarify the purpose and objectives of the study?
Do these goals confirm the achievement of broader goals?
B) does the research question or hypothesis clearly define the analytical path of the study?
The use of Bibliography.
A) whether, where appropriate, the literature review is clearly aware of the broad theoretical views relevant to the subject, as well as the.
Strengths and weaknesses?
B) does the literature review, where appropriate, indicate a clear understanding of policies / practices relevant to the subject?
C) does the literature review fully review the relevant research and prove the understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of other studies?
This is.
Does it mean that you have an understanding of the remaining gaps in the selected topic study?
D) did the author use sufficient sources?
Do you pay enough attention to academic and theoretical arguments as well as technical reports and case documents?
Is there any?
What are the missing references?
Do you confirm the source?
Research method of Hou.
A) does the author clearly describe the research methods used?
Whether the research methods used involve original research (for example, through interviews.
Survey or secondary data analysis to collect data)?
B) whether the chosen method is suitable for the research topic?
Are they in line with the logic of literature review?
C) is the selected method effectively used?
D) in the case of the use of case studies, are reasons for selection provided?
Is the case study relevant to a broader topic?
“work in the field (if applicable).
A) to what extent are the empirical data relevant to the objectives / assumptions and methods of the study?
Is there a gap in the data collected?
B) where relevant, is the design and analysis of the questionnaire adequate?
C) in the case of interviews, whether the author has considered the structure of the problem.
What is the range of respondents with transcriptional methods and choices?
D) does the author go beyond the obvious and show initiative or imagination in looking for relevant data in place?
E) does the author understand the difficulties in accessing data?
The quality of the argument.
A) does the work distinguish between “facts” and “values”? does the author try his or her best to avoid imposing his own values on the work, or is there a reasonable reason for these values?
B) is there an appropriate balance between description and analysis?
Whether each description is supported by appropriate analysis to prove the meaning of the event or phenomenon described.
Meaning or meaning?
C) is the argument presented clear and reasonable, or, on the contrary, does it tend to be incoherent, unstructured and repetitive?
D) are the conclusions reached by empirical evidence, appropriate references to statistical information or adequate support from relevant examples or case studies?
Works.
Do you avoid assertions and unsubstantiated inferences?
In the case that the available evidence is unable to draw a clear conclusion, is there a clear conclusion about this?
Know each other?
E) does this work express appreciation for the arguments raised in part of the paper on the meaning of the materials covered in other parts?
Debate whether or not.
Do it in a logical way to avoid contradictions?
F) do the conclusions provide novel explanations and arguments, or simply repeat the results of other studies?
The conclusion.
A) are the empirical findings used to emphasize policy / practical or theoretical implications?
B) are the conclusions drawn at the end of the paper clearly relevant to the questions raised at the beginning?
C) whether the author is aware of the limitations of the study
