Suggested 250~300 characters, divided into 4~5 parts, the structure is as follows.
01、Background:Using one sentence to summarise the background of your research (the general background of the study or the specific role, etc.)
02, the purpose of Objective: with 1 ~ 2 sentences to describe the purpose of your study
03、Method:Pay attention to the method to specify the type of research.
The starting and ending time of the study
How to sample
What statistical methods were used.
04, results RsulL: the important and statistically significant results of the study need to be described in detail here. Some authors are very planted in the period of the results of the two sentences, but also no specific values and P-value this is not enough.
05、Conclusion:briefly summarise the conclusions drawn from the study.
Introduction
The introduction generally contains the following parts.
01.General BackgroundIntroduction of the general scientific background of the study. Include epidemiology and current state of research. Highlighting the authors’ understanding of the background of the disease.
02.Specific Background:Narrow down to the sub-collar that the paper will address. Then re-emphasise the authors’ level of understanding of that sub-collateral city
03.Problems:After discussing what is known about the background, clearly express the areas that are still unstudied, especially the problems associated with this study, and highlight the innovation and clinical significance of this study.
04.Purpose of the study:Summarise and summarise the authors’ methodology and the purpose of the study, noting that 1 or 2 sentences can be used in this section as a summary of the novelty of the results.
Xx turmor is a leasing Cause of Cance moruaitly in . /MThe higp mortality rate of xx tumor is in part due ack of early dertection of xx Cancer marer/Peitance to esting the rapies in tumor is a major probiem in feld Extensive studes have fooused on the role of 80 in signaling pathway, howerersome recert tndngs suggested that ∞might be neclved in another important patheay/Athough x w3 reported to play a role in progressthe down stream signilirg mechanisms were not flly understood.
Materials and Methods
The Mathods section describes the experimental aspects of the thesis, which is relatively simple to write, but requires a lot of attention. The important thing is to be complete and scientific, which means that every part of the experiment should be taken care of, so as not to fail or miss some important parts. Methads part can be organised according to the experimental object, experimental equipment, experimental materials, experimental records, experimental analysis methods and so on. As long as the following four aspects can be described completely and scientifically, I believe that writing good Mechoxds: is not a major problem.
The advantage of doing so is to be able to ditch the corresponding analysis in Discussion, for example, some equipment should be corrected before use, and some require recalibration after each stage of the test to ensure the correctness of the results: be sure to explain in detail your operational steps or correction process, so that the reviewer can easily analyse your results!
C. Experimental materials, different disciplines have different requirements. Generally speaking, you should pay attention to explain the necessity of material selection, that is, it is better to have some explanation on why you choose this material If this point is not described clearly, it may lead to the whole experimental process is not valid.
D. Experimental process, that is, a clear description of the entire operation of the experimental process, generally accompanied by an experimental flow chart to illustrate. Flowchart of the Western method of many, there are text-based) there are text and schematic combination of different experiments have different practices, in general, the latter may be more (experimental subjects, especially so), because this will enable the reviewer to the experimental boundaries at a glance. If the schematic is well drawn, it may also add some impression of a distinct hierarchy in the description. Describe each step clearly, and do not create the impression that the process is confusing, as the reviewer will ultimately judge the validity of your experiment from the description of the process.
Commonly used sentences.
xxx cell lines were obtained from xxx and cultured under standard condition contaning
xxx medium supplemented with xx
Xxx mice were purchased from xxx company/prowided by xxx laboratory Mice were maintained and genotyped as previously desribedrefence). Approval for the use of mice was obtained from Xxx ethic commitee for laboratory animas.
Results
Some people write Results and Discussion together, but most papers keep them separate. Both approaches depend on the type of article, and if your results are more appropriately discussed alongside the analysis, and are not suitable to be analysed separately (or if that would be difficult and result in Dscustn
to become a chicken aid), it is appropriate to combine them together: conversely, they should be written separately.
The following are common phrases used in the results section.
X experiment was performed to identiy/demonstrate Xxx
Decreased mRNA/protein leves of c were observed in xxx
Decreased mRNA/protein leves of c were observed in xxx mRNA analysis of xxx showed signifcant increases of Xxxx
To explore the function of xxx we did xxx
xxx treatment ffecte something, indicating the role for xxx
Drug Asplication increased xxx
This finding was consistent with the previous finding that xxx
Our data demonstrated that 00 plays a role in xxx
Ligation and puncture in mice resuted in xxx
