The purpose of this article is to describe how to write a quality academic paper and its various parts.
Firstly, a formal academic paper should contain
Abstract
Introduction
Literature Review
Research Design
Result
Discussion and conclusion
In addition, be careful to avoid the overuse of “I” and a large number of adverbs and pronouns in your sentences.
Finally, please be sure to add and label the references. In this article, I will introduce you to several great techniques of discussion that will help you better present your ideas and create a better paper.
You can cite the results directly.
For example, if your theory verifies that a certain research object has an effect on another factor, then you can cite the findings in the original article as an argument.
For example, “According to the present study, X is positively correlated with Y.” The converse also applies.
If some factors are not tested, you may need to cite previous findings to support your argument, for example, “A previous study has indicated that Z does not influence W.”
Secondly, comparing results is a common discussion technique. When you refer to a comparison with a previous study, this can be used to support your point or to highlight something unique, for example, “The current finding substantiates that A correlates more significantly with B than C.”
Furthermore, “Contradictory results” is a common discussion situation.
A conflict occurs when you are trying to prove that a phenomenon or relationship is valid that does not exist, but you find that the current findings do not support the idea. This is when you need to rationalise the result, for example, “Our study was unable to confirm a correlation between X and Y; however, this result may be due to some factors like Q.”
Secondly, it is our duty to interpret the results. Sometimes, some results cannot be represented, and you need to analyse these reasons and give a reasonable view, e.g. “This may be because an overlooked factor of P had contributed substantially in generating such results.”
The next step is to enable hypothesis.
This is a common step in scientific research where a hypothesis is formulated to give direction to subsequent research.
The hypothesis should be expressed with care to ensure that it is rigorous and reasonable.
Finally, when commenting on certain findings, it is important to be both positive and critical to show objectivity. It all depends on whether you have enough evidence on paper to accurately judge the issue.
For example, when you refer to the plausibility of a particular experiment, you could state it directly, e.g. “The test effectively identified students who were competent in subject G.”
