I. Abstract
The purpose of this guide is to help researchers master the methodology of efficiently and accurately writing papers that meet the requirements of the SCI specifications. The paper will provide key points and detailed advice on various aspects of the five content modules (i.e., Background, Objectives, Methods, Results, and Conclusions).
II. Body of the paper
1. Background
A concise one-sentence summary of the importance of the research area covered in the paper and its contribution to technological, societal, or human well-being. When describing the general context, focus on the importance of this research; if specific applications are involved, elaborate on their commercial value and usefulness.
2. Objectives
Use compact language to portray the purpose of the research in the paper. When stating your point of view, try to be as objective as possible to distill the specific core research questions, clarify the research objectives and provide supporting data such as quantifiable indicators, e.g., P-values.
3. Methodology
This section should use standardised statements to complete the description of key information such as when the study began and ended, how the sample size was determined, and its statistical methods. In this section, please make sure that the statistical methods you use are rigorous enough to ensure that the results are accurate and reliable.
4. Results
This chapter requires an exhaustive list of the most important and statistically significant findings of the thesis. When presenting the results, accurately indicate the units of measurement used so that the reader can visualise the results and the value of the research.
5. Conclusion
This section summarises the conclusions of the study in clear and concise terms. It describes the salient points of the previous research, visualises the social value, and predicts the future development trend.
Structure of the Introduction
The introduction should contain four major sections:
1. Background
First, briefly introduce the scientific background, depicting the current state of the research problem in terms of data, and the current hotspots of scientific research. Be sure to mention your in-depth understanding of the topic.
2. Specific Background
Next, based on the above background information, focus on the specific subfield that the paper is intended to explain. Emphasise your in-depth understanding of this subfield to enhance the professionalism and credibility of the paper.
3. The unexplored part
Immediately following this, introduce questions that have not yet been addressed in the study, especially topics that are closely related to this study. Highlight the innovative nature of the study and its potential impact on clinical practice.
4. Brief description of the study objectives
Finally, summarise the methods and objectives used in the study. Ensure that the content is concise and easy to understand to set the stage for the analysis and discussion that follows.
IV. Materials and methods and others
1. Strictly follow the principles of experimental design
Every aspect of the experimental process must be well thought out and structor get clear and concise feedback. In order to facilitate the evaluator’s understanding, the process of adjusting the laboratory matrix must be described in detail.
2. Detailed explanation of the reasons for the selection of laboratory materials
According to the requirements of each discipline, analyse the rationality of the selected experimental materials, and give sufficient reasons to support them, so as to avoid the whole research process falling into the situation of rootlessness.
3. Pay attention to the experimental steps and process arrangement
When writing the experimental process, the entire experimental procedure must be clearly presented, and accompanied by a flow chart to assist in the description. The order and connection between the steps need to be clearly stated, so as not to cause this paper in the reader of the experiment on the logical misunderstanding of the misunderstanding.
Five, the results of the chapter structure
1. Explore the optimal solution of the proportion of suitable
When and only when the discussion process and results analysis can be synchronised, it is more appropriate to place them in the same section. If it is not possible to separate them effectively or it is so difficult to do so that the discussion becomes ineffective, the two parts should be considered to be combined in one article.
VI. Structure of the Conclusion
The conclusion should be structured similarly to the following chapters:
1. Review of past achievements
In this section, we should objectively evaluate the completed research and assess its value and status in the context of the existing grounded theory system.
2. Prospect of New Thinking
In this section, we should propose new hypotheses to address the problems revealed by the previous research, so as to provide possibilities for more far-reaching academic research in the future. In addition, the conclusion should highlight the far-reaching social significance of the research.
